After the pre-processing in part 1 Pre Processing (n = 280). We start to build the SuStaIn model.
In the table, only ROIs showing significant differences between cases (GDM exposure with obese/overweight child, n = 280) and controls (non-GDM exposure with healthy child, n = 6,149) are displayed, both before and after FDR correction.
For the plot, only ROIs with significant differences between cases (n = 280) and controls (n = 6,149) after FDR correction are shown.
| Category | Region | Before FDR | After FDR |
|---|---|---|---|
| Frontal | rostral middle frontal | ✔️ | ✔️ |
| pars triangularis | ✔️ | ✔️ | |
| pars opercularis | ✔️ | ✔️ | |
| superior frontal | ✔️ | ✔️ | |
| pars orbitalis | ✔️ | ✔️ | |
| lateral orbitofrontal | ✔️ | ❌ | |
| caudal middle frontal | ✔️ | ❌ | |
| Occipital | cuneus | ✔️ | ✔️ |
| Parietal | precuneus | ✔️ | ✔️ |
| superior parietal | ✔️ | ✔️ | |
| Temporal | fusiform | ✔️ | ❌ |
| superior temporal | ✔️ | ❌ | |
| middle temporal | ✔️ | ❌ | |
| Limbic | posterior cingulate | ✔️ | ❌ |
| # of significance | 14 | 8 |

Z_val = 1, Z_max = 1.5 ( determined roughly by the 95 percentile of the distribution)
The linear z-score model describes a subtype progression pattern as the linear evolution of biomarkers between different z-scores. Each stage corresponds to a biomarker reaching a new z-score from the set of z-scores for each biomarker, Z_vals. Each biomarker starts with a minimum value of 0 at stage 0 and reaches a maximum of Z_max at the final stage of the progression. The number of stages is determined by the number of biomarkers and z-scores in Z_vals.
Subtype 1: Frontal-first, then posterior spread
pars triangularis → rostral middle frontal → pars opercularis → superior frontal → pars orbitalis → precuneus → superior parietal → cuneus
Subtype 2: Posterior-first, then anterior spread
cuneus → superior parietal → precuneus → pars orbitalis → superior frontal → pars opercularis → rostral middle frontal → pars triangularis

Positional Variance Plot, optimal number of subtypes determined by cross-validation.
Interpretation from GPT, still need more research…
Subtype 1: Frontal-first, then posterior spread
Pattern
This subtype begins with inferior and middle frontal gyri involvement (pars and rostral middle frontal), extending to superior frontal regions, then shifts posteriorly to precuneus, superior parietal, and cuneus.
Possible interpretation
In adolescents, early frontal cortical thinning may suggest alterations in executive function, working memory, and emotional regulation. The later posterior spread could indicate a downstream effect on visuospatial integration and self-referential processing (precuneus).
GDM + obesity link
Maternal GDM and postnatal obesity have both been associated with fronto-parietal network vulnerability, possibly via metabolic inflammation and altered insulin signaling affecting frontal cortical maturation.
2. Subtype 2: Posterior-first, then anterior spread
Pattern
This subtype starts in occipital-parietal regions (cuneus, superior parietal, precuneus) — areas critical for visual processing and spatial attention — and then advances anteriorly toward the frontal cortex.